UnRiskIT® / DOE & Innovation Partnerships
DOE SBIR · FY2026 · Geothermal EGS

Addressing a critical gap in DOE's
subsurface energy toolset

UnRiskIT® is extending a commercially proven probabilistic decision engine into geothermal EGS, CCUS, and hydrogen storage applications — and actively pursuing federal funding and research partnerships to accelerate deployment.

The DOE Problem We Solve

A probabilistic decision layer
on top of DOE's existing toolset.

DOE's primary geothermal cost modeling tool — GETEM, now integrated into NREL's System Advisor Model (SAM) — provides solid deterministic cost estimation. It is not designed to propagate uncertainty through to economic outcomes or to support probabilistic decision-making under uncertainty.

As DOE accelerates geothermal and subsurface energy deployment, capital efficiency and decision quality are emerging as limiting factors in project scalability. The opportunity is to layer probabilistic economic decision support on top of the existing technical estimation frameworks rather than rebuild them.

UnRiskIT® is that decision layer. Commercially validated over 20+ years with major operators. Now being extended into the geothermal, CCUS, and hydrogen storage domains where DOE is investing billions.

How UnRiskIT® Complements DOE Tools

GETEM and SAM characterize technical and cost potential. UnRiskIT® extends those inputs by propagating uncertainty through cost, schedule, and economics — producing decision-relevant probabilistic outputs that complement, rather than replace, DOE's existing standards.

EERE / Office of Geothermal (OG)

Drilling cost reduction & risk-informed well placement

The Office of Geothermal's stated priority of reducing drilling costs and risks in EGS development maps directly to UnRiskIT®'s probabilistic well construction decision framework.

FECM / NETL

Digital tools for subsurface carbon & storage operations

FECM has funded digital decision tools for CO₂ transport, storage integrity, and subsurface uncertainty. UnRiskIT® extends this into probabilistic economic decision support.

DOE SBIR — All Offices

Cross-domain applicability without re-engineering

The same probabilistic architecture applies across geothermal, CCUS, and hydrogen storage — making UnRiskIT® a cross-cutting tool relevant to multiple DOE program offices.

Where We Extend the Toolset

The probabilistic decision layer
existing tools were not designed for.

DOE's existing toolset characterizes resource and cost potential well. UnRiskIT® adds the probabilistic decision support that connects those inputs to risked cost, schedule, and economic outcomes — the integrated capability that current standards and industry stacks do not provide together in one framework.

Capability Static / Deterministic Models Industry Tools UnRiskIT®
Probabilistic outputs ✗ Deterministic only PARTIAL ✓ Native Monte Carlo
Integrated cost + risk + schedule ✗ No FRAGMENTED ✓ Unified framework
Decision-centric outputs (NPV, drill/defer) ✗ Distributions only ✗ Reporting only ✓ Built in
Adaptive / real-time during operations ✗ No ✗ No ✓ Dynamic recalculation
Commercial operator validation N/A (technical estimation) ✓ Enterprise ✓ Major operators, 20+ years
Applicable to EGS, CCUS, H₂ storage DOMAIN-SPECIFIC ✗ Domain-specific ✓ Cross-domain architecture
Phase I SBIR Concept · FY2026

Probabilistic Decision Optimization
for Geothermal Well Construction

Unlike typical SBIR proposals, this work builds on a commercially deployed system — extending a proven architecture into geothermal EGS applications. This is domain extension, not greenfield R&D. Technical risk is low; commercialization path is clear.

Q1

Geothermal Domain Adaptation

Extend probabilistic engine for EGS-specific inputs: temperature gradient, resource uncertainty, stimulation risk, and dry-hole probability distributions

Q1–Q2

Historical Dataset Calibration

Calibrate against 3–5 EGS/hydrothermal well datasets from FORGE and other Office of Geothermal public records; document input uncertainty distributions

Q2

Comparative Analysis

Quantify difference between deterministic planning outputs and UnRiskIT® probabilistic decision outputs; measure P90–P10 spread reduction vs. baseline

Q3

Decision Optimization Demonstration

Replay historical drilling go/no-go decisions using probabilistic outputs; demonstrate measurable improvement in economic decision quality under real-world conditions

Q3–Q4

Phase II Roadmap

Define deployment architecture for active Office of Geothermal field test operators; identify 3 commercialization targets; prepare Phase II proposal

20–40%
AFE overrun reduction target
Targeted via historical scenario replay vs. deterministic baselines
15–25%
Cost uncertainty reduction
P90–P10 spread vs. deterministic planning assumptions
≥25%
Decision confidence shift
Economic ranking change across evaluated scenarios
$200–300K
Phase I award range · 12 months
EERE / Office of Geothermal SBIR primary target · FECM secondary

This work will demonstrate not only improved uncertainty characterization, but measurable improvement in economic decision quality under real-world conditions — shifting capital allocation decisions from static, assumption-driven planning to continuously updated, economically optimized decision-making.

Funding Landscape

Three active pathways.

EERE / Office of Geothermal (OG)

DOE SBIR FY2026 — Primary Target

Expected topic release October 2026 (EERE participates in the October cycle). Aligns with the Office of Geothermal's stated priority of reducing drilling costs and risks in EGS development. The probabilistic decision-support extension is the specific positioning.

Actively pursuing
FECM / NETL

Digital Tools for Subsurface Energy — Secondary Target

FECM has funded digital decision tools for CO₂ transport and storage integrity across multiple SBIR cycles. UnRiskIT® extends this into probabilistic economic decision support for CCUS and H₂ storage.

Tracking next cycle
EERE / Office of Geothermal

DE-FOA-0003472 Round 2 — Parallel Play

$171.5M NOFO for next-generation geothermal field tests remains open for recurring rounds (~12 months). UnRiskIT® as decision-support layer for a field test project team — teaming target, not prime.

Round 2 positioning
Partnership & Teaming

Who we want to work with.

We welcome discussions with national laboratories, geothermal developers, CCUS project teams, and operators who can provide validation data or letters of support — and who would benefit from Phase II deployment.

Validation Partner · STTR Eligible

NREL — National Renewable Energy Laboratory

NREL maintains GETEM, now part of the System Advisor Model (SAM). A CRADA or letter of collaboration from NREL — ideally via the SAM team — would validate UnRiskIT® as a complementary probabilistic decision layer on top of SAM/GETEM and open the STTR award pathway with a larger ceiling than SBIR.

Technical Advisor · FECM Alignment

NETL / LBNL — National Labs

Subsurface uncertainty expertise strengthens the FECM lane. NETL is the technical home for the CCUS / H₂ storage applications. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab's geothermal and CCS research programs offer direct technical validation and co-investigator opportunities.

End-User Validation · Phase II Path

OG-Funded Field Test Operators

Real project data from active EGS programs enables Phase I calibration and creates a direct Phase II deployment pathway. Letters of support from Office of Geothermal field test teams strengthen the market pull argument.

Industry Co-Validation · Risk Reduction

Prior Commercial Operators

Existing commercial deployment history demonstrates operator acceptance and reduces perceived execution risk relative to typical SBIR efforts. A letter confirming prior deployment is our single strongest credibility argument to DOE reviewers.

Immediate Actions — Before FY2026 Topics Drop
01Confirm active SAM.gov registration and UEI number — required for any DOE award submission
02Register on EERE eXCHANGE — the submission portal for GTO and EERE SBIR topics
03Reach the verified Office of Geothermal program inboxes — NextGen_GeoDrilling@ee.doe.gov for DE-FOA-0003472 Round 2 positioning, and DOE.Geothermal@ee.doe.gov to be routed to the appropriate sub-program manager for probabilistic decision tools
04Initiate NREL outreach via the SAM team (sam.nrel.gov) to explore STTR teaming or letter of collaboration — positioning UnRiskIT® as a complementary probabilistic decision layer on top of SAM/GETEM
05Secure letter of support from prior operator confirming commercial deployment — the single strongest execution-risk argument to DOE reviewers

Interested in partnering?

Whether you're a national laboratory, a geothermal developer, or a CCUS project team — we'd welcome the conversation about collaboration, teaming, or letters of support.

Discuss Partnership ← Back to Main Site